Creek vs Chickasaw Per Capita Income

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,484,884 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Creek and per capita income in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.628 and weighted average of $35,546. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,726,791 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and per capita income in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.505 and weighted average of $36,475, a difference of 2.6%.

In terms of per capita income, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Black/African American ($35,564, a difference of 0.050%), Hispanic or Latino ($35,688, a difference of 0.40%), Immigrants from Congo ($35,720, a difference of 0.49%), Cheyenne ($35,276, a difference of 0.76%), and Bangladeshi ($35,897, a difference of 0.99%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Bahamian ($36,427, a difference of 0.13%), Chippewa ($36,631, a difference of 0.43%), Ute ($36,651, a difference of 0.48%), Immigrants from Honduras ($36,665, a difference of 0.52%), and Fijian ($36,690, a difference of 0.59%).