Maltese vs Chickasaw Per Capita Income
COMPARE
Maltese
Chickasaw
Per Capita Income
Per Capita Income Comparison
Maltese
Chickasaw
$49,640
PER CAPITA INCOME
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
63rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
$36,475
PER CAPITA INCOME
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
312th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Maltese vs Chickasaw Per Capita Income Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 126,316,532 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Maltese and per capita income in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.470 and weighted average of $49,640. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,726,791 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and per capita income in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.505 and weighted average of $36,475, a difference of 36.1%.
Per Capita Income Correlation Summary
Measurement | Maltese | Chickasaw |
Minimum | $20,612 | $10,758 |
Maximum | $109,686 | $42,047 |
Range | $89,074 | $31,289 |
Mean | $50,567 | $28,009 |
Median | $48,495 | $27,826 |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | $44,523 | $24,362 |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | $55,569 | $31,977 |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | $11,046 | $7,616 |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | $14,877 | $5,659 |
Standard Deviation (Population) | $14,718 | $5,624 |
Similar Demographics by Per Capita Income
Demographics Similar to Maltese by Per Capita Income
In terms of per capita income, the demographic groups most similar to Maltese are Immigrants from Argentina ($49,627, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Asia ($49,741, a difference of 0.20%), Bolivian ($49,526, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Bulgaria ($49,482, a difference of 0.32%), and Immigrants from Romania ($49,463, a difference of 0.36%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Per Capita Income |
Asians | 99.9 /100 | #56 | Exceptional $50,057 |
South Africans | 99.9 /100 | #57 | Exceptional $50,044 |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 99.9 /100 | #58 | Exceptional $49,983 |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #59 | Exceptional $49,894 |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.9 /100 | #60 | Exceptional $49,893 |
Argentineans | 99.9 /100 | #61 | Exceptional $49,862 |
Immigrants | Asia | 99.9 /100 | #62 | Exceptional $49,741 |
Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #63 | Exceptional $49,640 |
Immigrants | Argentina | 99.9 /100 | #64 | Exceptional $49,627 |
Bolivians | 99.9 /100 | #65 | Exceptional $49,526 |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.9 /100 | #66 | Exceptional $49,482 |
Immigrants | Romania | 99.9 /100 | #67 | Exceptional $49,463 |
Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #68 | Exceptional $49,448 |
Immigrants | Canada | 99.8 /100 | #69 | Exceptional $49,412 |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 99.8 /100 | #70 | Exceptional $49,316 |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Per Capita Income
In terms of per capita income, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Bahamian ($36,427, a difference of 0.13%), Chippewa ($36,631, a difference of 0.43%), Ute ($36,651, a difference of 0.48%), Immigrants from Honduras ($36,665, a difference of 0.52%), and Fijian ($36,690, a difference of 0.59%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Per Capita Income |
Inupiat | 0.1 /100 | #305 | Tragic $36,999 |
Immigrants | Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic $36,849 |
Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic $36,823 |
Fijians | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic $36,690 |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic $36,665 |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic $36,651 |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic $36,631 |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic $36,475 |
Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic $36,427 |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic $36,180 |
Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic $36,112 |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic $35,999 |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic $35,922 |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic $35,897 |
Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic $35,720 |