Immigrants from Scotland vs Chinese Married-couple Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from Scotland
Chinese
Married-couple Households
Married-couple Households Comparison
Immigrants from Scotland
Chinese
49.3%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
26th/ 347
METRIC RANK
50.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
10th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Scotland vs Chinese Married-couple Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 196,383,501 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Scotland and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.044 and weighted average of 49.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,801,742 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.128 and weighted average of 50.4%, a difference of 2.2%.
Married-couple Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Scotland | Chinese |
| Minimum | 23.8% | 35.3% |
| Maximum | 84.6% | 63.0% |
| Range | 60.9% | 27.8% |
| Mean | 55.5% | 50.6% |
| Median | 53.0% | 51.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 48.2% | 46.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 62.1% | 56.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.9% | 9.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.8% | 7.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.7% | 7.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Scotland and Chinese by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Scotland are Bhutanese (49.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Philippines (49.3%, a difference of 0.13%), German (49.2%, a difference of 0.21%), Czech (49.4%, a difference of 0.32%), and Dutch (49.5%, a difference of 0.40%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Pennsylvania German (50.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Pakistan (50.1%, a difference of 0.44%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (50.6%, a difference of 0.55%), Swiss (49.9%, a difference of 0.81%), and Immigrants from Korea (49.9%, a difference of 0.98%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 50.6% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 50.4% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 50.4% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 50.1% |
| Swiss | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 49.9% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 49.9% |
| Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 49.8% |
| Koreans | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 49.7% |
| Swedes | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 49.7% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 49.6% |
| English | 99.9 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 49.6% |
| Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 49.6% |
| Scandinavians | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 49.6% |
| Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 49.5% |
| Asians | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 49.5% |
| Dutch | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 49.5% |
| Czechs | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 49.4% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 99.9 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 49.3% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 49.3% |
| Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 49.3% |
| Germans | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 49.2% |