Iroquois vs Ugandan Family Households
COMPARE
Iroquois
Ugandan
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Iroquois
Ugandans
62.2%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
304th/ 347
METRIC RANK
61.7%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
320th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Iroquois vs Ugandan Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 207,249,819 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.452 and weighted average of 62.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 93,998,948 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Ugandans and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.029 and weighted average of 61.7%, a difference of 0.87%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Iroquois | Ugandan |
| Minimum | 26.6% | 43.1% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 82.6% |
| Range | 73.4% | 39.5% |
| Mean | 64.2% | 63.6% |
| Median | 64.2% | 63.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 60.2% | 56.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 69.0% | 70.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.9% | 14.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.1% | 9.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.9% | 9.5% |
Demographics Similar to Iroquois and Ugandans by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are Cree (62.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Bermudan (62.2%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Kenya (62.3%, a difference of 0.16%), African (62.1%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Norway (62.1%, a difference of 0.26%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ugandans are Alsatian (61.7%, a difference of 0.050%), Cape Verdean (61.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Serbia (61.6%, a difference of 0.14%), Alaskan Athabascan (61.8%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (61.9%, a difference of 0.26%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 62.3% |
| Cree | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 62.3% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 62.2% |
| Bermudans | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 62.2% |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 62.1% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 62.1% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 62.1% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 62.1% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 62.0% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 62.0% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 62.0% |
| Liberians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 62.0% |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 61.9% |
| Moroccans | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 61.9% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 61.9% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 61.9% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 61.8% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 61.8% |
| Ugandans | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 61.7% |
| Alsatians | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 61.7% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 61.6% |