Immigrants from Morocco vs Ugandan Family Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from Morocco
Ugandan
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Immigrants from Morocco
Ugandans
62.0%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
311th/ 347
METRIC RANK
61.7%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
320th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Morocco vs Ugandan Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,909,930 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Morocco and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.013 and weighted average of 62.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 93,998,948 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Ugandans and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.029 and weighted average of 61.7%, a difference of 0.48%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Morocco | Ugandan |
Minimum | 38.9% | 43.1% |
Maximum | 86.0% | 82.6% |
Range | 47.1% | 39.5% |
Mean | 63.2% | 63.6% |
Median | 62.0% | 63.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 58.2% | 56.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 67.9% | 70.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.6% | 14.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.3% | 9.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.2% | 9.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Morocco and Ugandans by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Morocco are Immigrants from Liberia (62.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Latvia (62.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Liberian (62.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Subsaharan African (62.1%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Cabo Verde (61.9%, a difference of 0.10%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ugandans are Alsatian (61.7%, a difference of 0.050%), Cape Verdean (61.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Serbia (61.6%, a difference of 0.14%), Tlingit-Haida (61.6%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from West Indies (61.6%, a difference of 0.16%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Bermudans | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 62.2% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 62.1% |
Immigrants | Norway | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 62.1% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 62.1% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 62.1% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 62.0% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 62.0% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 62.0% |
Liberians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 62.0% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 61.9% |
Moroccans | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 61.9% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 61.9% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 61.9% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 61.8% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 61.8% |
Ugandans | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 61.7% |
Alsatians | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 61.7% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 61.6% |
Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 61.6% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 61.6% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 61.6% |