Cape Verdean vs Ugandan Family Households
COMPARE
Cape Verdean
Ugandan
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Cape Verdeans
Ugandans
61.8%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
319th/ 347
METRIC RANK
61.7%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
320th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cape Verdean vs Ugandan Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 107,550,283 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Cape Verdeans and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.002 and weighted average of 61.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 93,998,948 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Ugandans and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.029 and weighted average of 61.7%, a difference of 0.12%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Cape Verdean | Ugandan |
Minimum | 45.5% | 43.1% |
Maximum | 88.4% | 82.6% |
Range | 42.9% | 39.5% |
Mean | 62.0% | 63.6% |
Median | 61.5% | 63.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 57.5% | 56.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 66.1% | 70.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.6% | 14.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.9% | 9.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.8% | 9.5% |
Demographics Similar to Cape Verdeans and Ugandans by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Cape Verdeans are Alaskan Athabascan (61.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (61.9%, a difference of 0.14%), Alsatian (61.7%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Middle Africa (61.9%, a difference of 0.18%), and Moroccan (61.9%, a difference of 0.22%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ugandans are Alsatian (61.7%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Serbia (61.6%, a difference of 0.14%), Tlingit-Haida (61.6%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from West Indies (61.6%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Switzerland (61.6%, a difference of 0.17%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 62.1% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 62.0% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 62.0% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 62.0% |
Liberians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 62.0% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 61.9% |
Moroccans | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 61.9% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 61.9% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 61.9% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 61.8% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 61.8% |
Ugandans | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 61.7% |
Alsatians | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 61.7% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 61.6% |
Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 61.6% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 61.6% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 61.6% |
Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 61.5% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 61.5% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 61.4% |
Cambodians | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 61.4% |