Liberian vs Ugandan Family Households
COMPARE
Liberian
Ugandan
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Liberians
Ugandans
62.0%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
313th/ 347
METRIC RANK
61.7%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
320th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Liberian vs Ugandan Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,040,608 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Liberians and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.124 and weighted average of 62.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 93,998,948 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Ugandans and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.029 and weighted average of 61.7%, a difference of 0.43%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Liberian | Ugandan |
Minimum | 40.9% | 43.1% |
Maximum | 89.4% | 82.6% |
Range | 48.5% | 39.5% |
Mean | 64.2% | 63.6% |
Median | 63.0% | 63.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 60.3% | 56.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 67.1% | 70.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.8% | 14.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.3% | 9.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.3% | 9.5% |
Demographics Similar to Liberians and Ugandans by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Liberians are Immigrants from Latvia (62.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Morocco (62.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Cabo Verde (61.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Liberia (62.0%, a difference of 0.080%), and Moroccan (61.9%, a difference of 0.090%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ugandans are Alsatian (61.7%, a difference of 0.050%), Cape Verdean (61.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Serbia (61.6%, a difference of 0.14%), Tlingit-Haida (61.6%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from West Indies (61.6%, a difference of 0.16%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 62.1% |
Immigrants | Norway | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 62.1% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 62.1% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 62.1% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 62.0% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 62.0% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 62.0% |
Liberians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 62.0% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 61.9% |
Moroccans | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 61.9% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 61.9% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 61.9% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 61.8% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 61.8% |
Ugandans | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 61.7% |
Alsatians | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 61.7% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 61.6% |
Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 61.6% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 61.6% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 61.6% |
Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 61.5% |