Indian (Asian) vs Subsaharan African Currently Married
COMPARE
Indian (Asian)
Subsaharan African
Currently Married
Currently Married Comparison
Indians (Asian)
Sub-Saharan Africans
48.0%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
95.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
89th/ 347
METRIC RANK
42.6%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
292nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Indian (Asian) vs Subsaharan African Currently Married Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 495,221,745 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.023 and weighted average of 48.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 508,112,533 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.018 and weighted average of 42.6%, a difference of 12.7%.
Currently Married Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Indian (Asian) | Subsaharan African |
| Minimum | 29.3% | 1.8% |
| Maximum | 73.2% | 84.5% |
| Range | 43.9% | 82.7% |
| Mean | 50.1% | 40.3% |
| Median | 50.0% | 40.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 46.9% | 35.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 54.5% | 44.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.5% | 8.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.5% | 14.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.4% | 13.9% |
Similar Demographics by Currently Married
Demographics Similar to Indians (Asian) by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Indians (Asian) are American (48.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Bolivia (47.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Eastern Europe (48.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Jordanian (48.0%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Japan (48.0%, a difference of 0.090%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
| Immigrants | Europe | 96.9 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 48.1% |
| Bolivians | 96.9 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 48.1% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 96.9 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 48.1% |
| French Canadians | 96.3 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 48.0% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 96.2 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 48.0% |
| Jordanians | 96.2 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 48.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 96.1 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 48.0% |
| Indians (Asian) | 95.8 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 48.0% |
| Americans | 95.7 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 48.0% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 95.6 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 47.9% |
| Koreans | 95.4 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 47.9% |
| Lebanese | 95.1 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 47.9% |
| Native Hawaiians | 95.0 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 47.9% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 94.8 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 47.9% |
| Egyptians | 94.8 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 47.9% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Yuman (42.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Honduran (42.5%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Guatemala (42.6%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Ghana (42.7%, a difference of 0.27%), and Paiute (42.7%, a difference of 0.28%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 43.0% |
| Ghanaians | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 42.9% |
| Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 42.9% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 42.8% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 42.7% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 42.7% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 42.6% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 42.6% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 42.6% |
| Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 42.5% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 42.4% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 42.3% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 42.2% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 42.2% |
| Liberians | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 42.2% |