Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Subsaharan African Currently Married
COMPARE
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Subsaharan African
Currently Married
Currently Married Comparison
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Sub-Saharan Africans
46.7%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
52.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
171st/ 347
METRIC RANK
42.6%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
292nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Subsaharan African Currently Married Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,813,548 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.182 and weighted average of 46.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 508,112,533 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.018 and weighted average of 42.6%, a difference of 9.6%.
Currently Married Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Subsaharan African |
Minimum | 27.1% | 1.8% |
Maximum | 72.3% | 84.5% |
Range | 45.2% | 82.7% |
Mean | 50.5% | 40.3% |
Median | 49.7% | 40.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 44.7% | 35.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 57.6% | 44.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.9% | 8.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.3% | 14.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.2% | 13.9% |
Similar Demographics by Currently Married
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe are Aleut (46.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Tlingit-Haida (46.7%, a difference of 0.050%), Peruvian (46.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Brazil (46.6%, a difference of 0.090%), and Hawaiian (46.6%, a difference of 0.14%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 64.2 /100 | #164 | Good 46.9% |
Samoans | 59.8 /100 | #165 | Average 46.8% |
Immigrants | Syria | 59.3 /100 | #166 | Average 46.8% |
Spaniards | 58.8 /100 | #167 | Average 46.8% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 58.2 /100 | #168 | Average 46.8% |
Armenians | 58.2 /100 | #169 | Average 46.8% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 56.7 /100 | #170 | Average 46.7% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 52.4 /100 | #171 | Average 46.7% |
Aleuts | 52.0 /100 | #172 | Average 46.7% |
Tlingit-Haida | 51.2 /100 | #173 | Average 46.7% |
Peruvians | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 46.6% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 49.9 /100 | #175 | Average 46.6% |
Hawaiians | 48.6 /100 | #176 | Average 46.6% |
Israelis | 48.6 /100 | #177 | Average 46.6% |
Chickasaw | 47.8 /100 | #178 | Average 46.6% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Yuman (42.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Honduran (42.5%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Guatemala (42.6%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Ghana (42.7%, a difference of 0.27%), and Paiute (42.7%, a difference of 0.28%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 43.0% |
Ghanaians | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 42.9% |
Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 42.9% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 42.8% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 42.7% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 42.7% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 42.6% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 42.6% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 42.6% |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 42.5% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 42.4% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 42.3% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 42.2% |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 42.2% |
Liberians | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 42.2% |