Indian (Asian) vs Subsaharan African Cognitive Disability
COMPARE
Indian (Asian)
Subsaharan African
Cognitive Disability
Cognitive Disability Comparison
Indians (Asian)
Sub-Saharan Africans
16.8%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
97.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
112th/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.5%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
314th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Indian (Asian) vs Subsaharan African Cognitive Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 495,263,567 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.162 and weighted average of 16.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 508,099,215 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.038 and weighted average of 18.5%, a difference of 10.0%.
Cognitive Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Indian (Asian) | Subsaharan African |
Minimum | 8.0% | 2.3% |
Maximum | 27.5% | 40.3% |
Range | 19.5% | 38.0% |
Mean | 15.8% | 18.5% |
Median | 15.7% | 18.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.8% | 16.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.6% | 19.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.8% | 2.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.0% | 5.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.0% | 5.5% |
Similar Demographics by Cognitive Disability
Demographics Similar to Indians (Asian) by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Indians (Asian) are Immigrants from Sri Lanka (16.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Korean (16.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Uruguayan (16.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Albanian (16.8%, a difference of 0.040%), and Arapaho (16.8%, a difference of 0.040%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 97.9 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 16.8% |
Northern Europeans | 97.8 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 16.8% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 97.8 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 16.8% |
Canadians | 97.5 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 16.8% |
Albanians | 97.3 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 16.8% |
Arapaho | 97.3 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 16.8% |
Uruguayans | 97.2 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 16.8% |
Indians (Asian) | 97.2 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 16.8% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 97.1 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 16.8% |
Koreans | 97.1 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 16.8% |
Yup'ik | 96.9 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 16.9% |
Inupiat | 96.5 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 16.9% |
Immigrants | Japan | 96.2 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 16.9% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 96.2 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 16.9% |
South Africans | 95.5 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 16.9% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Yaqui (18.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Chickasaw (18.5%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Dominica (18.6%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Middle Africa (18.6%, a difference of 0.26%), and Liberian (18.6%, a difference of 0.34%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
Ugandans | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 18.3% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 18.4% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 18.4% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 18.4% |
Hmong | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 18.4% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 18.5% |
Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 18.5% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 18.5% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 18.6% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 18.6% |
Liberians | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 18.6% |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 18.6% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 18.6% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 18.6% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 18.6% |