Immigrants from China vs Pakistani Family Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from China
Pakistani
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Immigrants from China
Pakistanis
64.7%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
86.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
136th/ 347
METRIC RANK
64.7%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
84.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
142nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from China vs Pakistani Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 456,596,066 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.171 and weighted average of 64.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 335,180,363 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Pakistanis and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.101 and weighted average of 64.7%, a difference of 0.070%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from China | Pakistani |
| Minimum | 36.8% | 30.8% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 63.2% | 69.2% |
| Mean | 66.8% | 67.3% |
| Median | 67.1% | 66.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 62.5% | 62.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 74.9% | 73.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.4% | 10.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.3% | 12.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.3% | 12.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China and Pakistanis by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from Scotland (64.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Maltese (64.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Basque (64.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Jamaica (64.7%, a difference of 0.030%), and Immigrants from North Macedonia (64.7%, a difference of 0.040%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Pakistanis are Immigrants from North Macedonia (64.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Cameroon (64.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Jamaica (64.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Basque (64.7%, a difference of 0.040%), and Czechoslovakian (64.6%, a difference of 0.050%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 91.4 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 64.8% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 90.2 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 64.8% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 90.1 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 64.8% |
| Cajuns | 89.4 /100 | #132 | Excellent 64.8% |
| Belizeans | 89.3 /100 | #133 | Excellent 64.8% |
| Greeks | 88.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 64.7% |
| Maltese | 87.4 /100 | #135 | Excellent 64.7% |
| Immigrants | China | 86.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 64.7% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 86.4 /100 | #137 | Excellent 64.7% |
| Basques | 85.5 /100 | #138 | Excellent 64.7% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 85.3 /100 | #139 | Excellent 64.7% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 84.9 /100 | #140 | Excellent 64.7% |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 84.8 /100 | #141 | Excellent 64.7% |
| Pakistanis | 84.0 /100 | #142 | Excellent 64.7% |
| Czechoslovakians | 82.1 /100 | #143 | Excellent 64.6% |
| South American Indians | 81.9 /100 | #144 | Excellent 64.6% |
| Welsh | 80.1 /100 | #145 | Excellent 64.6% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 77.0 /100 | #146 | Good 64.6% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 76.5 /100 | #147 | Good 64.6% |
| Delaware | 76.3 /100 | #148 | Good 64.6% |
| Sioux | 76.3 /100 | #149 | Good 64.6% |