Immigrants from China vs Hmong Family Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from China
Hmong
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Immigrants from China
Hmong
64.7%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
86.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
136th/ 347
METRIC RANK
64.9%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
93.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
122nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from China vs Hmong Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 456,596,066 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.171 and weighted average of 64.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,604,422 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Hmong and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.098 and weighted average of 64.9%, a difference of 0.26%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from China | Hmong |
| Minimum | 36.8% | 42.8% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 82.3% |
| Range | 63.2% | 39.5% |
| Mean | 66.8% | 64.2% |
| Median | 67.1% | 63.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 62.5% | 60.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 74.9% | 67.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.4% | 6.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.3% | 7.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.3% | 7.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China and Hmong by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from Scotland (64.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Maltese (64.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Basque (64.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Jamaica (64.7%, a difference of 0.030%), and Greek (64.7%, a difference of 0.050%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Hmong are Choctaw (64.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Argentina (64.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Belize (64.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Hungarian (64.9%, a difference of 0.040%), and Immigrants from Oceania (64.9%, a difference of 0.050%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 94.4 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 94.2 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Hungarians | 94.0 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Hmong | 93.4 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Choctaw | 93.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 92.8 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Immigrants | Belize | 92.7 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Panamanians | 92.4 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 64.8% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 92.0 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 64.8% |
| Italians | 91.9 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 64.8% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 91.4 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 64.8% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 90.2 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 64.8% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 90.1 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 64.8% |
| Cajuns | 89.4 /100 | #132 | Excellent 64.8% |
| Belizeans | 89.3 /100 | #133 | Excellent 64.8% |
| Greeks | 88.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 64.7% |
| Maltese | 87.4 /100 | #135 | Excellent 64.7% |
| Immigrants | China | 86.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 64.7% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 86.4 /100 | #137 | Excellent 64.7% |
| Basques | 85.5 /100 | #138 | Excellent 64.7% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 85.3 /100 | #139 | Excellent 64.7% |