Immigrants from China vs Nonimmigrants Family Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from China
Nonimmigrants
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Immigrants from China
Nonimmigrants
64.7%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
86.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
136th/ 347
METRIC RANK
64.8%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
90.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
131st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from China vs Nonimmigrants Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 456,596,066 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.171 and weighted average of 64.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 584,651,779 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Nonimmigrants and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.398 and weighted average of 64.8%, a difference of 0.11%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from China | Nonimmigrants |
Minimum | 36.8% | 38.2% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 63.2% | 61.8% |
Mean | 66.8% | 68.5% |
Median | 67.1% | 67.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 62.5% | 64.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 74.9% | 72.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.4% | 8.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.3% | 8.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.3% | 8.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China and Nonimmigrants by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from Scotland (64.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Maltese (64.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Basque (64.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Jamaica (64.7%, a difference of 0.030%), and Immigrants from North Macedonia (64.7%, a difference of 0.040%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Nonimmigrants are Immigrants from Italy (64.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Cajun (64.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Belizean (64.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Ecuador (64.8%, a difference of 0.050%), and Italian (64.8%, a difference of 0.070%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Choctaw | 93.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 64.9% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 92.8 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 64.9% |
Immigrants | Belize | 92.7 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 64.9% |
Panamanians | 92.4 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 64.8% |
Immigrants | Panama | 92.0 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 64.8% |
Italians | 91.9 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 64.8% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 91.4 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 64.8% |
Immigrants | Italy | 90.2 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 64.8% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 90.1 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 64.8% |
Cajuns | 89.4 /100 | #132 | Excellent 64.8% |
Belizeans | 89.3 /100 | #133 | Excellent 64.8% |
Greeks | 88.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 64.7% |
Maltese | 87.4 /100 | #135 | Excellent 64.7% |
Immigrants | China | 86.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 64.7% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 86.4 /100 | #137 | Excellent 64.7% |
Basques | 85.5 /100 | #138 | Excellent 64.7% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 85.3 /100 | #139 | Excellent 64.7% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 84.9 /100 | #140 | Excellent 64.7% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 84.8 /100 | #141 | Excellent 64.7% |
Pakistanis | 84.0 /100 | #142 | Excellent 64.7% |
Czechoslovakians | 82.1 /100 | #143 | Excellent 64.6% |