Immigrants from China vs Cherokee Family Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from China
Cherokee
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Immigrants from China
Cherokee
64.7%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
86.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
136th/ 347
METRIC RANK
65.0%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
95.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
117th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from China vs Cherokee Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 456,596,066 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.171 and weighted average of 64.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 493,383,151 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.410 and weighted average of 65.0%, a difference of 0.39%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from China | Cherokee |
| Minimum | 36.8% | 31.0% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 63.2% | 69.0% |
| Mean | 66.8% | 69.9% |
| Median | 67.1% | 67.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 62.5% | 64.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 74.9% | 72.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.4% | 8.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.3% | 11.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.3% | 11.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China and Cherokee by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Maltese (64.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Greek (64.7%, a difference of 0.050%), Cajun (64.8%, a difference of 0.090%), Belizean (64.8%, a difference of 0.090%), and Nonimmigrants (64.8%, a difference of 0.11%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Cherokee are Immigrants from Iraq (65.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Dutch (64.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Eastern Asia (64.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Oceania (64.9%, a difference of 0.080%), and Hungarian (64.9%, a difference of 0.090%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 95.4 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 65.0% |
| Cherokee | 95.3 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 65.0% |
| Dutch | 95.1 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 94.4 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 94.2 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Hungarians | 94.0 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Hmong | 93.4 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Choctaw | 93.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 92.8 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Immigrants | Belize | 92.7 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Panamanians | 92.4 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 64.8% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 92.0 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 64.8% |
| Italians | 91.9 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 64.8% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 91.4 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 64.8% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 90.2 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 64.8% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 90.1 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 64.8% |
| Cajuns | 89.4 /100 | #132 | Excellent 64.8% |
| Belizeans | 89.3 /100 | #133 | Excellent 64.8% |
| Greeks | 88.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 64.7% |
| Maltese | 87.4 /100 | #135 | Excellent 64.7% |
| Immigrants | China | 86.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 64.7% |