Choctaw vs Pakistani Family Households
COMPARE
Choctaw
Pakistani
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Choctaw
Pakistanis
64.9%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
93.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
123rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
64.7%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
84.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
142nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Choctaw vs Pakistani Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 269,627,638 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.395 and weighted average of 64.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 335,180,363 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Pakistanis and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.101 and weighted average of 64.7%, a difference of 0.33%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Choctaw | Pakistani |
| Minimum | 43.9% | 30.8% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 56.1% | 69.2% |
| Mean | 66.7% | 67.3% |
| Median | 65.7% | 66.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 62.6% | 62.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 68.1% | 73.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.5% | 10.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.8% | 12.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.7% | 12.0% |
Demographics Similar to Choctaw and Pakistanis by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Hmong (64.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Argentina (64.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Belize (64.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Panamanian (64.8%, a difference of 0.050%), and Immigrants from Panama (64.8%, a difference of 0.070%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Pakistanis are Immigrants from North Macedonia (64.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Cameroon (64.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Jamaica (64.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Basque (64.7%, a difference of 0.040%), and Immigrants from Scotland (64.7%, a difference of 0.060%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Hmong | 93.4 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Choctaw | 93.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 92.8 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Immigrants | Belize | 92.7 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Panamanians | 92.4 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 64.8% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 92.0 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 64.8% |
| Italians | 91.9 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 64.8% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 91.4 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 64.8% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 90.2 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 64.8% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 90.1 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 64.8% |
| Cajuns | 89.4 /100 | #132 | Excellent 64.8% |
| Belizeans | 89.3 /100 | #133 | Excellent 64.8% |
| Greeks | 88.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 64.7% |
| Maltese | 87.4 /100 | #135 | Excellent 64.7% |
| Immigrants | China | 86.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 64.7% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 86.4 /100 | #137 | Excellent 64.7% |
| Basques | 85.5 /100 | #138 | Excellent 64.7% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 85.3 /100 | #139 | Excellent 64.7% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 84.9 /100 | #140 | Excellent 64.7% |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 84.8 /100 | #141 | Excellent 64.7% |
| Pakistanis | 84.0 /100 | #142 | Excellent 64.7% |