Immigrants from Afghanistan vs Polish Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Afghanistan
Polish
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Afghanistan
Poles
5.6%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
59th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.2%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
26.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
197th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Afghanistan vs Polish Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,636,321 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Afghanistan and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.366 and weighted average of 5.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 560,051,234 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Poles and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.570 and weighted average of 6.2%, a difference of 10.2%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Afghanistan | Polish |
Minimum | 2.1% | 2.2% |
Maximum | 10.2% | 47.7% |
Range | 8.1% | 45.5% |
Mean | 5.8% | 9.1% |
Median | 5.5% | 6.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.1% | 6.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.4% | 8.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.3% | 2.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.5% | 7.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.5% | 7.3% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Afghanistan by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Afghanistan are Immigrants from Zimbabwe (5.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Lithuania (5.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Brazil (5.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Belgium (5.6%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Spain (5.6%, a difference of 0.17%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Jordanians | 99.8 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 99.8 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 99.8 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.8 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Inupiat | 99.8 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 99.8 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.8 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.8 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 99.7 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Spain | 99.7 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | France | 99.7 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Laotians | 99.7 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 99.7 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Israelis | 99.6 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Demographics Similar to Poles by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Poles are Malaysian (6.2%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (6.2%, a difference of 0.12%), Belgian (6.2%, a difference of 0.15%), Alaska Native (6.2%, a difference of 0.23%), and Guatemalan (6.2%, a difference of 0.24%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 33.4 /100 | #190 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 31.9 /100 | #191 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 31.6 /100 | #192 | Fair 6.2% |
Guatemalans | 30.0 /100 | #193 | Fair 6.2% |
Alaska Natives | 29.8 /100 | #194 | Fair 6.2% |
Belgians | 28.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 6.2% |
Malaysians | 28.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 6.2% |
Poles | 26.3 /100 | #197 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 24.6 /100 | #198 | Fair 6.2% |
Italians | 22.6 /100 | #199 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 21.5 /100 | #200 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Central America | 20.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 6.2% |
Albanians | 19.7 /100 | #202 | Poor 6.2% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 18.4 /100 | #203 | Poor 6.2% |
Immigrants | Congo | 18.2 /100 | #204 | Poor 6.2% |