Immigrants from Latin America vs Polish Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Latin America
Polish
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Latin America
Poles
6.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
11.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
215th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.2%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
26.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
197th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Latin America vs Polish Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 558,117,601 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latin America and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.018 and weighted average of 6.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 560,051,234 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Poles and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.570 and weighted average of 6.2%, a difference of 1.4%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Latin America | Polish |
Minimum | 2.4% | 2.2% |
Maximum | 13.5% | 47.7% |
Range | 11.1% | 45.5% |
Mean | 6.2% | 9.1% |
Median | 6.2% | 6.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.7% | 6.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.5% | 8.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.86% | 2.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.4% | 7.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.4% | 7.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Latin America and Poles by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Latin America are Immigrants from Mexico (6.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Canadian (6.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Mexican American Indian (6.3%, a difference of 0.13%), Japanese (6.3%, a difference of 0.13%), and Samoan (6.3%, a difference of 0.14%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Poles are Malaysian (6.2%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (6.2%, a difference of 0.12%), Italian (6.2%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Cambodia (6.2%, a difference of 0.35%), and Immigrants from Central America (6.2%, a difference of 0.46%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Malaysians | 28.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 6.2% |
Poles | 26.3 /100 | #197 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 24.6 /100 | #198 | Fair 6.2% |
Italians | 22.6 /100 | #199 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 21.5 /100 | #200 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Central America | 20.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 6.2% |
Albanians | 19.7 /100 | #202 | Poor 6.2% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 18.4 /100 | #203 | Poor 6.2% |
Immigrants | Congo | 18.2 /100 | #204 | Poor 6.2% |
Slovenes | 18.0 /100 | #205 | Poor 6.2% |
Finns | 17.2 /100 | #206 | Poor 6.2% |
Alsatians | 15.1 /100 | #207 | Poor 6.3% |
Bangladeshis | 14.2 /100 | #208 | Poor 6.3% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 14.0 /100 | #209 | Poor 6.3% |
Immigrants | Laos | 13.2 /100 | #210 | Poor 6.3% |
Samoans | 12.1 /100 | #211 | Poor 6.3% |
Mexican American Indians | 12.0 /100 | #212 | Poor 6.3% |
Japanese | 12.0 /100 | #213 | Poor 6.3% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 11.0 /100 | #214 | Poor 6.3% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 11.0 /100 | #215 | Poor 6.3% |
Canadians | 10.9 /100 | #216 | Poor 6.3% |