Immigrants from Israel vs Polish Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Israel
Polish
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Israel
Poles
5.4%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
22nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.2%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
26.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
197th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Israel vs Polish Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 210,002,102 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Israel and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.508 and weighted average of 5.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 560,051,234 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Poles and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.570 and weighted average of 6.2%, a difference of 15.2%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Israel | Polish |
| Minimum | 0.69% | 2.2% |
| Maximum | 24.6% | 47.7% |
| Range | 24.0% | 45.5% |
| Mean | 5.8% | 9.1% |
| Median | 5.1% | 6.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.9% | 6.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.1% | 8.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.2% | 2.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.7% | 7.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.7% | 7.3% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Israel by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Israel are Tongan (5.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (5.4%, a difference of 0.13%), Zimbabwean (5.4%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Nepal (5.4%, a difference of 0.25%), and Ethiopian (5.4%, a difference of 0.37%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Zimbabweans | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Asians | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Cambodians | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Demographics Similar to Poles by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Poles are Malaysian (6.2%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (6.2%, a difference of 0.12%), Belgian (6.2%, a difference of 0.15%), Alaska Native (6.2%, a difference of 0.23%), and Guatemalan (6.2%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 33.4 /100 | #190 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 31.9 /100 | #191 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 31.6 /100 | #192 | Fair 6.2% |
| Guatemalans | 30.0 /100 | #193 | Fair 6.2% |
| Alaska Natives | 29.8 /100 | #194 | Fair 6.2% |
| Belgians | 28.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 6.2% |
| Malaysians | 28.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 6.2% |
| Poles | 26.3 /100 | #197 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 24.6 /100 | #198 | Fair 6.2% |
| Italians | 22.6 /100 | #199 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 21.5 /100 | #200 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 20.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 6.2% |
| Albanians | 19.7 /100 | #202 | Poor 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 18.4 /100 | #203 | Poor 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 18.2 /100 | #204 | Poor 6.2% |