Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Chickasaw Vision Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Middle Africa
Chickasaw
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Middle Africa
Chickasaw
2.2%
VISION DISABILITY
33.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
185th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.2%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
338th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Chickasaw Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 202,642,272 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Middle Africa and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.217 and weighted average of 2.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,658,152 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.299 and weighted average of 3.2%, a difference of 45.2%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Middle Africa | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 0.56% | 0.33% |
Maximum | 10.3% | 15.2% |
Range | 9.7% | 14.8% |
Mean | 2.4% | 5.4% |
Median | 2.1% | 4.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.7% | 3.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.4% | 6.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.66% | 2.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.6% | 2.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.5% | 2.8% |
Similar Demographics by Vision Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Middle Africa by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Middle Africa are Native Hawaiian (2.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Moroccan (2.2%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (2.2%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (2.2%, a difference of 0.30%), and Guyanese (2.2%, a difference of 0.34%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Immigrants | Oceania | 45.1 /100 | #178 | Average 2.2% |
Immigrants | North America | 44.5 /100 | #179 | Average 2.2% |
Uruguayans | 42.7 /100 | #180 | Average 2.2% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 41.1 /100 | #181 | Average 2.2% |
Costa Ricans | 40.7 /100 | #182 | Average 2.2% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 37.9 /100 | #183 | Fair 2.2% |
Moroccans | 35.4 /100 | #184 | Fair 2.2% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 33.5 /100 | #185 | Fair 2.2% |
Native Hawaiians | 33.3 /100 | #186 | Fair 2.2% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 30.3 /100 | #187 | Fair 2.2% |
Guyanese | 28.9 /100 | #188 | Fair 2.2% |
Salvadorans | 27.4 /100 | #189 | Fair 2.2% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 26.1 /100 | #190 | Fair 2.2% |
Canadians | 25.8 /100 | #191 | Fair 2.2% |
Europeans | 25.7 /100 | #192 | Fair 2.2% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Tsimshian (3.2%, a difference of 0.69%), Creek (3.2%, a difference of 0.82%), Dutch West Indian (3.2%, a difference of 0.91%), Alaskan Athabascan (3.1%, a difference of 0.93%), and Navajo (3.1%, a difference of 1.1%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 3.0% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 3.1% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 3.1% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 3.1% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 3.1% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 3.1% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 3.2% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 3.2% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 3.2% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 3.2% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 3.3% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 3.3% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 3.3% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 3.3% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 3.4% |