Immigrants from Africa vs Chickasaw Vision Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Africa
Chickasaw
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Africa
Chickasaw
2.1%
VISION DISABILITY
62.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
167th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.2%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
338th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Africa vs Chickasaw Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 468,780,270 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Africa and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.127 and weighted average of 2.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,658,152 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.299 and weighted average of 3.2%, a difference of 48.0%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Africa | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 0.17% | 0.33% |
Maximum | 4.2% | 15.2% |
Range | 4.0% | 14.8% |
Mean | 2.1% | 5.4% |
Median | 2.1% | 4.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.8% | 3.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.3% | 6.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.50% | 2.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.70% | 2.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.70% | 2.8% |
Similar Demographics by Vision Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Africa by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Africa are Immigrants from England (2.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Brazilian (2.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Iraq (2.1%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (2.1%, a difference of 0.20%), and Icelander (2.1%, a difference of 0.24%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Austrians | 69.0 /100 | #160 | Good 2.1% |
Iraqis | 67.7 /100 | #161 | Good 2.1% |
Hungarians | 67.4 /100 | #162 | Good 2.1% |
Icelanders | 66.1 /100 | #163 | Good 2.1% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 65.5 /100 | #164 | Good 2.1% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 64.8 /100 | #165 | Good 2.1% |
Immigrants | England | 62.8 /100 | #166 | Good 2.1% |
Immigrants | Africa | 62.6 /100 | #167 | Good 2.1% |
Brazilians | 62.2 /100 | #168 | Good 2.1% |
South American Indians | 57.4 /100 | #169 | Average 2.2% |
Swiss | 55.7 /100 | #170 | Average 2.2% |
Lebanese | 54.3 /100 | #171 | Average 2.2% |
Northern Europeans | 50.1 /100 | #172 | Average 2.2% |
Scandinavians | 50.0 /100 | #173 | Average 2.2% |
Immigrants | Canada | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 2.2% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Tsimshian (3.2%, a difference of 0.69%), Creek (3.2%, a difference of 0.82%), Dutch West Indian (3.2%, a difference of 0.91%), Alaskan Athabascan (3.1%, a difference of 0.93%), and Navajo (3.1%, a difference of 1.1%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 3.0% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 3.1% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 3.1% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 3.1% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 3.1% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 3.1% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 3.2% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 3.2% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 3.2% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 3.2% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 3.3% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 3.3% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 3.3% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 3.3% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 3.4% |