Immigrants from Western Europe vs Chickasaw Vision Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Western Europe
Chickasaw
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Western Europe
Chickasaw
2.2%
VISION DISABILITY
41.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
181st/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.2%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
338th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Western Europe vs Chickasaw Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 493,396,041 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Western Europe and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.922 and weighted average of 2.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,658,152 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.299 and weighted average of 3.2%, a difference of 45.9%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Western Europe | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 1.2% | 0.33% |
Maximum | 75.4% | 15.2% |
Range | 74.2% | 14.8% |
Mean | 7.0% | 5.4% |
Median | 2.6% | 4.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.9% | 3.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.1% | 6.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.2% | 2.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.7% | 2.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.5% | 2.8% |
Similar Demographics by Vision Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Western Europe by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Western Europe are Costa Rican (2.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Uruguayan (2.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (2.2%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from North America (2.2%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from Oceania (2.2%, a difference of 0.26%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Immigrants | Canada | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 2.2% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 47.6 /100 | #175 | Average 2.2% |
Yugoslavians | 46.5 /100 | #176 | Average 2.2% |
Slavs | 46.0 /100 | #177 | Average 2.2% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 45.1 /100 | #178 | Average 2.2% |
Immigrants | North America | 44.5 /100 | #179 | Average 2.2% |
Uruguayans | 42.7 /100 | #180 | Average 2.2% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 41.1 /100 | #181 | Average 2.2% |
Costa Ricans | 40.7 /100 | #182 | Average 2.2% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 37.9 /100 | #183 | Fair 2.2% |
Moroccans | 35.4 /100 | #184 | Fair 2.2% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 33.5 /100 | #185 | Fair 2.2% |
Native Hawaiians | 33.3 /100 | #186 | Fair 2.2% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 30.3 /100 | #187 | Fair 2.2% |
Guyanese | 28.9 /100 | #188 | Fair 2.2% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Tsimshian (3.2%, a difference of 0.69%), Creek (3.2%, a difference of 0.82%), Dutch West Indian (3.2%, a difference of 0.91%), Alaskan Athabascan (3.1%, a difference of 0.93%), and Navajo (3.1%, a difference of 1.1%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 3.0% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 3.1% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 3.1% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 3.1% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 3.1% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 3.1% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 3.2% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 3.2% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 3.2% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 3.2% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 3.3% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 3.3% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 3.3% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 3.3% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 3.4% |