Immigrants from Guatemala vs Chickasaw Vision Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Guatemala
Chickasaw
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Guatemala
Chickasaw
2.4%
VISION DISABILITY
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
255th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.2%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
338th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Guatemala vs Chickasaw Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 377,092,792 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Guatemala and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.258 and weighted average of 2.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,658,152 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.299 and weighted average of 3.2%, a difference of 34.2%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Guatemala | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 0.29% | 0.33% |
Maximum | 14.0% | 15.2% |
Range | 13.7% | 14.8% |
Mean | 2.6% | 5.4% |
Median | 2.4% | 4.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.1% | 3.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.9% | 6.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.78% | 2.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.7% | 2.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.7% | 2.8% |
Similar Demographics by Vision Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Guatemala by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Guatemala are Haitian (2.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Japanese (2.4%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Haiti (2.4%, a difference of 0.33%), Immigrants from Micronesia (2.4%, a difference of 0.38%), and West Indian (2.4%, a difference of 0.40%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.5 /100 | #248 | Tragic 2.3% |
Liberians | 0.5 /100 | #249 | Tragic 2.3% |
Bangladeshis | 0.5 /100 | #250 | Tragic 2.3% |
Immigrants | Laos | 0.4 /100 | #251 | Tragic 2.4% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 2.4% |
Japanese | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 2.4% |
Haitians | 0.3 /100 | #254 | Tragic 2.4% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.3 /100 | #255 | Tragic 2.4% |
Immigrants | Haiti | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 2.4% |
West Indians | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 2.4% |
British West Indians | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 2.4% |
Whites/Caucasians | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 2.4% |
Belizeans | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 2.4% |
Fijians | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 2.4% |
Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 2.4% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Tsimshian (3.2%, a difference of 0.69%), Creek (3.2%, a difference of 0.82%), Dutch West Indian (3.2%, a difference of 0.91%), Alaskan Athabascan (3.1%, a difference of 0.93%), and Navajo (3.1%, a difference of 1.1%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 3.0% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 3.1% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 3.1% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 3.1% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 3.1% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 3.1% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 3.2% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 3.2% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 3.2% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 3.2% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 3.3% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 3.3% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 3.3% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 3.3% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 3.4% |