Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Brazilian Vision Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Middle Africa
Brazilian
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Middle Africa
Brazilians
2.2%
VISION DISABILITY
33.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
185th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.1%
VISION DISABILITY
62.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
168th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Brazilian Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 202,642,272 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Middle Africa and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.217 and weighted average of 2.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 323,719,841 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Brazilians and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.324 and weighted average of 2.1%, a difference of 1.9%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Middle Africa | Brazilian |
| Minimum | 0.56% | 0.54% |
| Maximum | 10.3% | 8.2% |
| Range | 9.7% | 7.7% |
| Mean | 2.4% | 2.5% |
| Median | 2.1% | 2.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.7% | 1.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.4% | 2.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.66% | 1.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.6% | 1.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.5% | 1.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Middle Africa and Brazilians by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Middle Africa are Native Hawaiian (2.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Moroccan (2.2%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (2.2%, a difference of 0.30%), Costa Rican (2.2%, a difference of 0.48%), and Immigrants from Western Europe (2.2%, a difference of 0.51%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Brazilians are Immigrants from Africa (2.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from England (2.1%, a difference of 0.040%), South American Indian (2.2%, a difference of 0.32%), Swiss (2.2%, a difference of 0.43%), and Lebanese (2.2%, a difference of 0.52%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Immigrants | England | 62.8 /100 | #166 | Good 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 62.6 /100 | #167 | Good 2.1% |
| Brazilians | 62.2 /100 | #168 | Good 2.1% |
| South American Indians | 57.4 /100 | #169 | Average 2.2% |
| Swiss | 55.7 /100 | #170 | Average 2.2% |
| Lebanese | 54.3 /100 | #171 | Average 2.2% |
| Northern Europeans | 50.1 /100 | #172 | Average 2.2% |
| Scandinavians | 50.0 /100 | #173 | Average 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 47.6 /100 | #175 | Average 2.2% |
| Yugoslavians | 46.5 /100 | #176 | Average 2.2% |
| Slavs | 46.0 /100 | #177 | Average 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 45.1 /100 | #178 | Average 2.2% |
| Immigrants | North America | 44.5 /100 | #179 | Average 2.2% |
| Uruguayans | 42.7 /100 | #180 | Average 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 41.1 /100 | #181 | Average 2.2% |
| Costa Ricans | 40.7 /100 | #182 | Average 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 37.9 /100 | #183 | Fair 2.2% |
| Moroccans | 35.4 /100 | #184 | Fair 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 33.5 /100 | #185 | Fair 2.2% |
| Native Hawaiians | 33.3 /100 | #186 | Fair 2.2% |