Immigrants from Latin America vs Bangladeshi Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Latin America
Bangladeshi
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Latin America
Bangladeshis
6.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
11.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
215th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
14.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
208th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Latin America vs Bangladeshi Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 558,117,601 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latin America and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.018 and weighted average of 6.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 141,368,014 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Bangladeshis and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.173 and weighted average of 6.3%, a difference of 0.38%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Latin America | Bangladeshi |
Minimum | 2.4% | 3.4% |
Maximum | 13.5% | 15.6% |
Range | 11.1% | 12.2% |
Mean | 6.2% | 7.0% |
Median | 6.2% | 6.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.7% | 5.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.5% | 7.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.86% | 1.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.4% | 2.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.4% | 2.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Latin America and Bangladeshis by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Latin America are Immigrants from Mexico (6.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Canadian (6.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Yugoslavian (6.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Guamanian/Chamorro (6.3%, a difference of 0.050%), and Mexican American Indian (6.3%, a difference of 0.13%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bangladeshis are Immigrants from Iraq (6.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Alsatian (6.3%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Laos (6.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Samoan (6.3%, a difference of 0.24%), and Mexican American Indian (6.3%, a difference of 0.25%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | Central America | 20.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 6.2% |
Albanians | 19.7 /100 | #202 | Poor 6.2% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 18.4 /100 | #203 | Poor 6.2% |
Immigrants | Congo | 18.2 /100 | #204 | Poor 6.2% |
Slovenes | 18.0 /100 | #205 | Poor 6.2% |
Finns | 17.2 /100 | #206 | Poor 6.2% |
Alsatians | 15.1 /100 | #207 | Poor 6.3% |
Bangladeshis | 14.2 /100 | #208 | Poor 6.3% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 14.0 /100 | #209 | Poor 6.3% |
Immigrants | Laos | 13.2 /100 | #210 | Poor 6.3% |
Samoans | 12.1 /100 | #211 | Poor 6.3% |
Mexican American Indians | 12.0 /100 | #212 | Poor 6.3% |
Japanese | 12.0 /100 | #213 | Poor 6.3% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 11.0 /100 | #214 | Poor 6.3% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 11.0 /100 | #215 | Poor 6.3% |
Canadians | 10.9 /100 | #216 | Poor 6.3% |
Yugoslavians | 10.9 /100 | #217 | Poor 6.3% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 10.6 /100 | #218 | Poor 6.3% |
Indonesians | 9.9 /100 | #219 | Tragic 6.3% |
Immigrants | Albania | 9.6 /100 | #220 | Tragic 6.3% |
Hungarians | 9.6 /100 | #221 | Tragic 6.3% |