Immigrants from Israel vs Alsatian Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Israel
Alsatian
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Israel
Alsatians
5.4%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
22nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
15.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
207th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Israel vs Alsatian Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 210,002,102 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Israel and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.508 and weighted average of 5.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 82,679,981 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Alsatians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.269 and weighted average of 6.3%, a difference of 16.3%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Israel | Alsatian |
| Minimum | 0.69% | 0.97% |
| Maximum | 24.6% | 29.2% |
| Range | 24.0% | 28.2% |
| Mean | 5.8% | 7.7% |
| Median | 5.1% | 6.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.9% | 5.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.1% | 9.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.2% | 3.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.7% | 5.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.7% | 5.3% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Israel by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Israel are Tongan (5.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (5.4%, a difference of 0.13%), Zimbabwean (5.4%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Nepal (5.4%, a difference of 0.25%), and Ethiopian (5.4%, a difference of 0.37%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Zimbabweans | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Asians | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Cambodians | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Demographics Similar to Alsatians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Alsatians are Bangladeshi (6.3%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Iraq (6.3%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Laos (6.3%, a difference of 0.19%), Finnish (6.2%, a difference of 0.21%), and Slovene (6.2%, a difference of 0.28%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 21.5 /100 | #200 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 20.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 6.2% |
| Albanians | 19.7 /100 | #202 | Poor 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 18.4 /100 | #203 | Poor 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 18.2 /100 | #204 | Poor 6.2% |
| Slovenes | 18.0 /100 | #205 | Poor 6.2% |
| Finns | 17.2 /100 | #206 | Poor 6.2% |
| Alsatians | 15.1 /100 | #207 | Poor 6.3% |
| Bangladeshis | 14.2 /100 | #208 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 14.0 /100 | #209 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 13.2 /100 | #210 | Poor 6.3% |
| Samoans | 12.1 /100 | #211 | Poor 6.3% |
| Mexican American Indians | 12.0 /100 | #212 | Poor 6.3% |
| Japanese | 12.0 /100 | #213 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 11.0 /100 | #214 | Poor 6.3% |