Immigrants from Guatemala vs Chippewa Vision Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Guatemala
Chippewa
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Guatemala
Chippewa
2.4%
VISION DISABILITY
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
255th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.4%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
275th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Guatemala vs Chippewa Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 377,092,792 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Guatemala and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.258 and weighted average of 2.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 214,949,512 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.255 and weighted average of 2.4%, a difference of 2.9%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Guatemala | Chippewa |
Minimum | 0.29% | 0.77% |
Maximum | 14.0% | 8.4% |
Range | 13.7% | 7.6% |
Mean | 2.6% | 3.1% |
Median | 2.4% | 2.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.1% | 2.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.9% | 3.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.78% | 1.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.7% | 1.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.7% | 1.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Guatemala and Chippewa by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Guatemala are Immigrants from Haiti (2.4%, a difference of 0.33%), West Indian (2.4%, a difference of 0.40%), British West Indian (2.4%, a difference of 0.43%), White/Caucasian (2.4%, a difference of 0.44%), and Belizean (2.4%, a difference of 0.61%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Immigrants from Latin America (2.4%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from Bahamas (2.4%, a difference of 0.63%), Spaniard (2.4%, a difference of 0.96%), Immigrants from the Azores (2.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and Cuban (2.4%, a difference of 1.2%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.3 /100 | #255 | Tragic 2.4% |
Immigrants | Haiti | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 2.4% |
West Indians | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 2.4% |
British West Indians | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 2.4% |
Whites/Caucasians | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 2.4% |
Belizeans | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 2.4% |
Fijians | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 2.4% |
Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 2.4% |
Immigrants | Belize | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 2.4% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 2.4% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 2.4% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 2.4% |
Ute | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 2.4% |
Senegalese | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 2.4% |
Celtics | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 2.4% |
Cubans | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 2.4% |
Immigrants | Azores | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 2.4% |
Spaniards | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 2.4% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 2.4% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 2.4% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 2.4% |