Immigrants from Chile vs Immigrants from Morocco Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Chile
Immigrants from Morocco
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Chile
Immigrants from Morocco
5.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
98.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
87th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
97.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
106th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Chile vs Immigrants from Morocco Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 218,629,833 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.824 and weighted average of 5.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,910,370 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Morocco and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.269 and weighted average of 5.8%, a difference of 1.3%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Chile | Immigrants from Morocco |
Minimum | 2.4% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 23.8% | 12.4% |
Range | 21.4% | 11.1% |
Mean | 6.8% | 5.8% |
Median | 5.5% | 5.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.9% | 4.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.2% | 6.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.3% | 1.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.3% | 2.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.2% | 2.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Morocco by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Chile are Soviet Union (5.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Latvian (5.7%, a difference of 0.060%), Bhutanese (5.8%, a difference of 0.16%), Australian (5.8%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Sudan (5.8%, a difference of 0.17%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Morocco are Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (5.8%, a difference of 0.070%), New Zealander (5.8%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Romania (5.8%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Kenya (5.8%, a difference of 0.31%), and Immigrants from Serbia (5.8%, a difference of 0.39%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Latvians | 99.0 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Chile | 98.9 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Soviet Union | 98.9 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Bhutanese | 98.8 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Australians | 98.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 98.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 98.6 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 98.6 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Kenyans | 98.4 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 98.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Salvadorans | 98.4 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 98.3 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 98.3 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 98.2 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 97.9 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | South America | 97.9 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 97.8 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Romania | 97.7 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 5.8% |
New Zealanders | 97.6 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 97.4 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 97.3 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 5.8% |