Immigrants from Africa vs South American Indian Vision Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Africa
South American Indian
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Africa
South American Indians
2.1%
VISION DISABILITY
62.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
167th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.2%
VISION DISABILITY
57.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
169th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Africa vs South American Indian Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 468,780,270 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Africa and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.127 and weighted average of 2.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,540,973 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of South American Indians and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.109 and weighted average of 2.2%, a difference of 0.34%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Africa | South American Indian |
Minimum | 0.17% | 0.64% |
Maximum | 4.2% | 7.1% |
Range | 4.0% | 6.4% |
Mean | 2.1% | 2.4% |
Median | 2.1% | 2.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.8% | 1.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.3% | 2.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.50% | 1.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.70% | 1.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.70% | 1.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Africa and South American Indians by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Africa are Immigrants from England (2.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Brazilian (2.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Iraq (2.1%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (2.1%, a difference of 0.20%), and Icelander (2.1%, a difference of 0.24%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to South American Indians are Swiss (2.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Lebanese (2.2%, a difference of 0.20%), Brazilian (2.1%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from England (2.1%, a difference of 0.36%), and Northern European (2.2%, a difference of 0.47%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 69.9 /100 | #158 | Good 2.1% |
South Africans | 69.8 /100 | #159 | Good 2.1% |
Austrians | 69.0 /100 | #160 | Good 2.1% |
Iraqis | 67.7 /100 | #161 | Good 2.1% |
Hungarians | 67.4 /100 | #162 | Good 2.1% |
Icelanders | 66.1 /100 | #163 | Good 2.1% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 65.5 /100 | #164 | Good 2.1% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 64.8 /100 | #165 | Good 2.1% |
Immigrants | England | 62.8 /100 | #166 | Good 2.1% |
Immigrants | Africa | 62.6 /100 | #167 | Good 2.1% |
Brazilians | 62.2 /100 | #168 | Good 2.1% |
South American Indians | 57.4 /100 | #169 | Average 2.2% |
Swiss | 55.7 /100 | #170 | Average 2.2% |
Lebanese | 54.3 /100 | #171 | Average 2.2% |
Northern Europeans | 50.1 /100 | #172 | Average 2.2% |
Scandinavians | 50.0 /100 | #173 | Average 2.2% |
Immigrants | Canada | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 2.2% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 47.6 /100 | #175 | Average 2.2% |
Yugoslavians | 46.5 /100 | #176 | Average 2.2% |
Slavs | 46.0 /100 | #177 | Average 2.2% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 45.1 /100 | #178 | Average 2.2% |