Immigrants from Afghanistan vs Tsimshian Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Afghanistan
Tsimshian
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Afghanistan
Tsimshian
5.6%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
59th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
344th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Afghanistan vs Tsimshian Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,636,321 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Afghanistan and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.366 and weighted average of 5.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,626,544 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.395 and weighted average of 8.8%, a difference of 56.7%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Afghanistan | Tsimshian |
| Minimum | 2.1% | 4.1% |
| Maximum | 10.2% | 25.7% |
| Range | 8.1% | 21.5% |
| Mean | 5.8% | 10.2% |
| Median | 5.5% | 8.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.1% | 6.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.4% | 13.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.3% | 6.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.5% | 5.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.5% | 5.2% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Afghanistan by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Afghanistan are Immigrants from Zimbabwe (5.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Lithuania (5.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Brazil (5.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Belgium (5.6%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Spain (5.6%, a difference of 0.17%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Jordanians | 99.8 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 99.8 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 99.8 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.8 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Inupiat | 99.8 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 99.8 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.8 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.8 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 99.7 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 99.7 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | France | 99.7 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Laotians | 99.7 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 99.7 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Israelis | 99.6 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Demographics Similar to Tsimshian by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Tsimshian are Puerto Rican (8.9%, a difference of 0.59%), Tohono O'odham (8.7%, a difference of 0.97%), Kiowa (8.6%, a difference of 2.5%), Creek (8.5%, a difference of 4.4%), and Houma (9.3%, a difference of 5.5%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 7.9% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 7.9% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 8.0% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 8.0% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 8.3% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 8.5% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 8.6% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 8.7% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 8.8% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 8.9% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 9.3% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 9.5% |