Creek vs Iranian Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Creek
Iranian
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Creek
Iranians
8.5%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
341st/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
9th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Creek vs Iranian Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,444,493 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.537 and weighted average of 8.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 316,801,609 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Iranians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.165 and weighted average of 5.1%, a difference of 64.8%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Creek | Iranian |
| Minimum | 2.3% | 1.7% |
| Maximum | 30.8% | 19.5% |
| Range | 28.5% | 17.7% |
| Mean | 12.5% | 5.4% |
| Median | 11.7% | 4.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.7% | 3.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.9% | 5.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.2% | 1.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.0% | 3.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.0% | 3.3% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Creek by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Choctaw (8.3%, a difference of 1.6%), Kiowa (8.6%, a difference of 1.9%), Pima (8.2%, a difference of 2.5%), Colville (8.2%, a difference of 2.8%), and Tohono O'odham (8.7%, a difference of 3.4%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 7.9% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 7.9% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 8.0% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 8.0% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 8.3% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 8.5% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 8.6% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 8.7% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 8.8% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 8.9% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 9.3% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 9.5% |
Demographics Similar to Iranians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Iranians are Immigrants from South Central Asia (5.1%, a difference of 0.36%), Yup'ik (5.2%, a difference of 0.60%), Bolivian (5.1%, a difference of 1.4%), Immigrants from Bolivia (5.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and Immigrants from Korea (5.2%, a difference of 2.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Yup'ik | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 5.2% |
| Okinawans | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 5.3% |