Creek vs Pima Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Creek
Pima
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Creek
Pima
8.5%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
341st/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.2%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
339th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Creek vs Pima Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,444,493 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.537 and weighted average of 8.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,538,415 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.261 and weighted average of 8.2%, a difference of 2.5%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Creek | Pima |
Minimum | 2.3% | 3.8% |
Maximum | 30.8% | 29.5% |
Range | 28.5% | 25.7% |
Mean | 12.5% | 11.0% |
Median | 11.7% | 8.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.7% | 6.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.9% | 12.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.2% | 5.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.0% | 6.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.0% | 6.2% |
Demographics Similar to Creek and Pima by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Choctaw (8.3%, a difference of 1.6%), Kiowa (8.6%, a difference of 1.9%), Colville (8.2%, a difference of 2.8%), Tohono O'odham (8.7%, a difference of 3.4%), and Dutch West Indian (8.2%, a difference of 3.4%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Colville (8.2%, a difference of 0.35%), Choctaw (8.3%, a difference of 0.83%), Dutch West Indian (8.2%, a difference of 0.92%), Seminole (8.0%, a difference of 2.6%), and Chickasaw (8.0%, a difference of 2.6%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 7.6% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 7.6% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 7.7% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 7.8% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 7.8% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 7.9% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 7.9% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 8.0% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 8.0% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 8.2% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 8.2% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 8.2% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 8.3% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 8.5% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 8.6% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 8.7% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 8.8% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 8.9% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 9.3% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 9.5% |