Creek vs Immigrants from Africa Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Creek
Immigrants from Africa
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Creek
Immigrants from Africa
8.5%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
341st/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
94.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
116th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Creek vs Immigrants from Africa Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,444,493 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.537 and weighted average of 8.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 469,140,674 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Africa and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.191 and weighted average of 5.9%, a difference of 43.6%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Creek | Immigrants from Africa |
| Minimum | 2.3% | 0.17% |
| Maximum | 30.8% | 19.4% |
| Range | 28.5% | 19.2% |
| Mean | 12.5% | 6.1% |
| Median | 11.7% | 5.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.7% | 5.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.9% | 6.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.2% | 1.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.0% | 2.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.0% | 2.6% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Creek by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Choctaw (8.3%, a difference of 1.6%), Kiowa (8.6%, a difference of 1.9%), Pima (8.2%, a difference of 2.5%), Colville (8.2%, a difference of 2.8%), and Tohono O'odham (8.7%, a difference of 3.4%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 7.9% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 7.9% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 8.0% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 8.0% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 8.3% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 8.5% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 8.6% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 8.7% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 8.8% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 8.9% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 9.3% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 9.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Africa by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Africa are South American Indian (5.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Poland (5.9%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Uruguay (5.9%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (5.9%, a difference of 0.28%), and Russian (5.9%, a difference of 0.32%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 97.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 96.7 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Danes | 96.6 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| South Africans | 96.3 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 95.6 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 95.4 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| South American Indians | 94.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 94.7 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 93.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Russians | 93.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Norwegians | 93.1 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Estonians | 92.9 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Costa Ricans | 92.6 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Icelanders | 92.6 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 92.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 5.9% |