Cambodian vs Iranian Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Cambodian
Iranian
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Cambodians
Iranians
5.4%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
28th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
9th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cambodian vs Iranian Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 102,504,705 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Cambodians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.072 and weighted average of 5.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 316,801,609 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Iranians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.165 and weighted average of 5.1%, a difference of 5.5%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Cambodian | Iranian |
Minimum | 0.17% | 1.7% |
Maximum | 16.9% | 19.5% |
Range | 16.7% | 17.7% |
Mean | 5.7% | 5.4% |
Median | 5.4% | 4.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.0% | 3.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.9% | 5.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.9% | 1.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.2% | 3.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.1% | 3.3% |
Demographics Similar to Cambodians and Iranians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Cambodians are Asian (5.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Nepal (5.4%, a difference of 0.22%), Zimbabwean (5.4%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (5.4%, a difference of 0.33%), and Tongan (5.4%, a difference of 0.42%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Iranians are Immigrants from South Central Asia (5.1%, a difference of 0.36%), Yup'ik (5.2%, a difference of 0.60%), Immigrants from Korea (5.2%, a difference of 2.2%), Okinawan (5.3%, a difference of 2.6%), and Burmese (5.3%, a difference of 3.1%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Yup'ik | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 5.2% |
Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 5.2% |
Okinawans | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Zimbabweans | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Asians | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Cambodians | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 5.4% |