Creek vs Immigrants from Nicaragua Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Creek
Immigrants from Nicaragua
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Creek
Immigrants from Nicaragua
8.5%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
341st/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
43.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
180th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Creek vs Immigrants from Nicaragua Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,444,493 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.537 and weighted average of 8.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 236,322,252 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Nicaragua and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.475 and weighted average of 6.1%, a difference of 37.7%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Creek | Immigrants from Nicaragua |
| Minimum | 2.3% | 1.7% |
| Maximum | 30.8% | 22.6% |
| Range | 28.5% | 20.9% |
| Mean | 12.5% | 6.8% |
| Median | 11.7% | 6.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.7% | 5.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.9% | 6.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.2% | 1.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.0% | 3.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.0% | 3.5% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Creek by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Choctaw (8.3%, a difference of 1.6%), Kiowa (8.6%, a difference of 1.9%), Pima (8.2%, a difference of 2.5%), Colville (8.2%, a difference of 2.8%), and Tohono O'odham (8.7%, a difference of 3.4%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 7.9% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 7.9% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 8.0% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 8.0% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 8.3% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 8.5% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 8.6% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 8.7% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 8.8% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 8.9% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 9.3% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 9.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Nicaragua by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Nicaragua are Austrian (6.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Scandinavian (6.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Swiss (6.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Serbian (6.1%, a difference of 0.060%), and Immigrants from England (6.1%, a difference of 0.080%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Croatians | 51.2 /100 | #173 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 6.1% |
| Vietnamese | 47.2 /100 | #175 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | North America | 45.6 /100 | #176 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | England | 45.4 /100 | #177 | Average 6.1% |
| Scandinavians | 44.5 /100 | #178 | Average 6.1% |
| Austrians | 44.1 /100 | #179 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 43.9 /100 | #180 | Average 6.1% |
| Swiss | 43.1 /100 | #181 | Average 6.1% |
| Serbians | 42.8 /100 | #182 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 42.2 /100 | #183 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 41.2 /100 | #184 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 37.2 /100 | #185 | Fair 6.2% |
| Europeans | 36.2 /100 | #186 | Fair 6.2% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 35.3 /100 | #187 | Fair 6.2% |