Bhutanese vs White/Caucasian Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Bhutanese
White/Caucasian
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Bhutanese
Whites/Caucasians
5.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
98.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
89th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.7%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
273rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bhutanese vs White/Caucasian Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 455,305,094 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.248 and weighted average of 5.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 582,664,974 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Whites/Caucasians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.432 and weighted average of 6.7%, a difference of 16.2%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Bhutanese | White/Caucasian |
| Minimum | 0.28% | 5.9% |
| Maximum | 14.0% | 10.5% |
| Range | 13.8% | 4.6% |
| Mean | 6.2% | 7.1% |
| Median | 5.7% | 6.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.0% | 6.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.0% | 7.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.0% | 1.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.1% | 0.96% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.1% | 0.96% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Bhutanese by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Australian (5.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Sudan (5.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Soviet Union (5.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Chile (5.8%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Sierra Leone (5.8%, a difference of 0.17%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Palestinians | 99.2 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Ugandans | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| South Americans | 99.0 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Latvians | 99.0 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 98.9 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Soviet Union | 98.9 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Bhutanese | 98.8 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Australians | 98.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 98.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 98.6 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 98.6 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Kenyans | 98.4 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 98.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Salvadorans | 98.4 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Demographics Similar to Whites/Caucasians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Whites/Caucasians are French Canadian (6.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Sioux (6.7%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Guyana (6.7%, a difference of 0.31%), Celtic (6.7%, a difference of 0.34%), and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (6.7%, a difference of 0.38%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Guyanese | 0.2 /100 | #266 | Tragic 6.6% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #267 | Tragic 6.6% |
| Spanish | 0.2 /100 | #268 | Tragic 6.6% |
| French | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 6.6% |
| Slovaks | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 6.7% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 6.7% |
| French Canadians | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 6.7% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 6.7% |
| Sioux | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 6.7% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 6.7% |
| Celtics | 0.1 /100 | #276 | Tragic 6.7% |
| Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #277 | Tragic 6.7% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.1 /100 | #278 | Tragic 6.7% |
| Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 6.7% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 6.8% |