Bhutanese vs British West Indian Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Bhutanese
British West Indian
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Bhutanese
British West Indians
5.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
98.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
89th/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
301st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bhutanese vs British West Indian Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 455,305,094 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.248 and weighted average of 5.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 152,684,150 people shows no correlation between the proportion of British West Indians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.033 and weighted average of 7.0%, a difference of 20.9%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Bhutanese | British West Indian |
| Minimum | 0.28% | 1.9% |
| Maximum | 14.0% | 12.1% |
| Range | 13.8% | 10.2% |
| Mean | 6.2% | 6.8% |
| Median | 5.7% | 6.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.0% | 6.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.0% | 7.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.0% | 1.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.1% | 2.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.1% | 2.0% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Bhutanese by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Australian (5.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Sudan (5.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Soviet Union (5.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Chile (5.8%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Sierra Leone (5.8%, a difference of 0.17%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Palestinians | 99.2 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Ugandans | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| South Americans | 99.0 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Latvians | 99.0 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 98.9 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Soviet Union | 98.9 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Bhutanese | 98.8 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Australians | 98.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 98.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 98.6 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 98.6 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Kenyans | 98.4 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 98.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Salvadorans | 98.4 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Demographics Similar to British West Indians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to British West Indians are Immigrants from Armenia (7.0%, a difference of 0.060%), African (7.0%, a difference of 0.11%), Marshallese (6.9%, a difference of 0.23%), Puget Sound Salish (6.9%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Grenada (6.9%, a difference of 0.37%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 6.9% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 6.9% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 6.9% |
| French American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 6.9% |
| Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 6.9% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 6.9% |
| Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 6.9% |
| British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 7.0% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 7.0% |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 7.0% |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 7.0% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 7.0% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 7.1% |