Soviet Union vs White/Caucasian Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Soviet Union
White/Caucasian
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Soviet Union
Whites/Caucasians
5.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
98.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
88th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.7%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
273rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Soviet Union vs White/Caucasian Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,487,843 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Soviet Union and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.141 and weighted average of 5.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 582,664,974 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Whites/Caucasians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.432 and weighted average of 6.7%, a difference of 16.3%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Soviet Union | White/Caucasian |
| Minimum | 2.6% | 5.9% |
| Maximum | 10.8% | 10.5% |
| Range | 8.2% | 4.6% |
| Mean | 5.3% | 7.1% |
| Median | 5.7% | 6.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.1% | 6.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.3% | 7.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.3% | 1.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.7% | 0.96% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.6% | 0.96% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Soviet Union by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Soviet Union are Immigrants from Chile (5.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Latvian (5.7%, a difference of 0.11%), Bhutanese (5.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Australian (5.8%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from Sudan (5.8%, a difference of 0.12%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 99.2 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Palestinians | 99.2 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Ugandans | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| South Americans | 99.0 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Latvians | 99.0 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 98.9 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Soviet Union | 98.9 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Bhutanese | 98.8 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Australians | 98.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 98.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 98.6 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 98.6 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Kenyans | 98.4 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 98.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Demographics Similar to Whites/Caucasians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Whites/Caucasians are French Canadian (6.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Sioux (6.7%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Guyana (6.7%, a difference of 0.31%), Celtic (6.7%, a difference of 0.34%), and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (6.7%, a difference of 0.38%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Guyanese | 0.2 /100 | #266 | Tragic 6.6% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #267 | Tragic 6.6% |
| Spanish | 0.2 /100 | #268 | Tragic 6.6% |
| French | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 6.6% |
| Slovaks | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 6.7% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 6.7% |
| French Canadians | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 6.7% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 6.7% |
| Sioux | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 6.7% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 6.7% |
| Celtics | 0.1 /100 | #276 | Tragic 6.7% |
| Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #277 | Tragic 6.7% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.1 /100 | #278 | Tragic 6.7% |
| Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 6.7% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 6.8% |