Mexican American Indian vs White/Caucasian Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Mexican American Indian
White/Caucasian
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Mexican American Indians
Whites/Caucasians
6.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
12.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
212th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.7%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
273rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Mexican American Indian vs White/Caucasian Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 317,517,841 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Mexican American Indians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.170 and weighted average of 6.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 582,664,974 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Whites/Caucasians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.432 and weighted average of 6.7%, a difference of 6.6%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Mexican American Indian | White/Caucasian |
Minimum | 0.46% | 5.9% |
Maximum | 19.4% | 10.5% |
Range | 18.9% | 4.6% |
Mean | 7.6% | 7.1% |
Median | 6.8% | 6.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.2% | 6.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.6% | 7.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.5% | 1.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.5% | 0.96% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.5% | 0.96% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Mexican American Indians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Mexican American Indians are Japanese (6.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Samoan (6.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Mexico (6.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Latin America (6.3%, a difference of 0.13%), and Canadian (6.3%, a difference of 0.14%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Slovenes | 18.0 /100 | #205 | Poor 6.2% |
Finns | 17.2 /100 | #206 | Poor 6.2% |
Alsatians | 15.1 /100 | #207 | Poor 6.3% |
Bangladeshis | 14.2 /100 | #208 | Poor 6.3% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 14.0 /100 | #209 | Poor 6.3% |
Immigrants | Laos | 13.2 /100 | #210 | Poor 6.3% |
Samoans | 12.1 /100 | #211 | Poor 6.3% |
Mexican American Indians | 12.0 /100 | #212 | Poor 6.3% |
Japanese | 12.0 /100 | #213 | Poor 6.3% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 11.0 /100 | #214 | Poor 6.3% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 11.0 /100 | #215 | Poor 6.3% |
Canadians | 10.9 /100 | #216 | Poor 6.3% |
Yugoslavians | 10.9 /100 | #217 | Poor 6.3% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 10.6 /100 | #218 | Poor 6.3% |
Indonesians | 9.9 /100 | #219 | Tragic 6.3% |
Demographics Similar to Whites/Caucasians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Whites/Caucasians are French Canadian (6.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Sioux (6.7%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Guyana (6.7%, a difference of 0.31%), Celtic (6.7%, a difference of 0.34%), and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (6.7%, a difference of 0.38%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Guyanese | 0.2 /100 | #266 | Tragic 6.6% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #267 | Tragic 6.6% |
Spanish | 0.2 /100 | #268 | Tragic 6.6% |
French | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 6.6% |
Slovaks | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 6.7% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 6.7% |
French Canadians | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 6.7% |
Whites/Caucasians | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 6.7% |
Sioux | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 6.7% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 6.7% |
Celtics | 0.1 /100 | #276 | Tragic 6.7% |
Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #277 | Tragic 6.7% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.1 /100 | #278 | Tragic 6.7% |
Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 6.7% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 6.8% |