Bhutanese vs Immigrants from Micronesia Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Bhutanese
Immigrants from Micronesia
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Bhutanese
Immigrants from Micronesia
5.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
98.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
89th/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
305th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bhutanese vs Immigrants from Micronesia Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 455,305,094 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.248 and weighted average of 5.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,585,357 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Micronesia and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.281 and weighted average of 7.0%, a difference of 21.8%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Bhutanese | Immigrants from Micronesia |
Minimum | 0.28% | 1.8% |
Maximum | 14.0% | 18.4% |
Range | 13.8% | 16.6% |
Mean | 6.2% | 7.3% |
Median | 5.7% | 7.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.0% | 5.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.0% | 8.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.0% | 3.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.1% | 3.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.1% | 3.5% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Bhutanese by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Australian (5.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Sudan (5.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Soviet Union (5.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Chile (5.8%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Sierra Leone (5.8%, a difference of 0.17%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Palestinians | 99.2 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Ugandans | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 5.7% |
South Americans | 99.0 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Latvians | 99.0 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Chile | 98.9 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Soviet Union | 98.9 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Bhutanese | 98.8 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Australians | 98.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 98.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 98.6 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 98.6 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Kenyans | 98.4 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 98.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Salvadorans | 98.4 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Micronesia by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Micronesia are Immigrants from Cabo Verde (7.0%, a difference of 0.29%), Iroquois (7.1%, a difference of 0.53%), African (7.0%, a difference of 0.64%), Immigrants from Armenia (7.0%, a difference of 0.70%), and British West Indian (7.0%, a difference of 0.76%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 6.9% |
Puget Sound Salish | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 6.9% |
Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 6.9% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 7.0% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 7.0% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 7.0% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 7.0% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 7.0% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 7.1% |
Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 7.1% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 7.1% |
Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 7.1% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 7.1% |
Cree | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 7.1% |
Delaware | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 7.1% |