Alsatian vs Japanese Vision Disability
COMPARE
Alsatian
Japanese
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Alsatians
Japanese
2.3%
VISION DISABILITY
0.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
245th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.4%
VISION DISABILITY
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
253rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Alsatian vs Japanese Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 82,677,708 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Alsatians and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.465 and weighted average of 2.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 249,077,012 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Japanese and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.715 and weighted average of 2.4%, a difference of 0.80%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Alsatian | Japanese |
| Minimum | 1.1% | 0.43% |
| Maximum | 6.7% | 14.1% |
| Range | 5.6% | 13.7% |
| Mean | 3.2% | 3.6% |
| Median | 2.7% | 2.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.3% | 2.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.8% | 3.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.5% | 1.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.4% | 2.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.4% | 2.5% |
Demographics Similar to Alsatians and Japanese by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Alsatians are Immigrants from Nicaragua (2.3%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from West Indies (2.3%, a difference of 0.090%), French (2.3%, a difference of 0.15%), Guatemalan (2.3%, a difference of 0.19%), and Subsaharan African (2.3%, a difference of 0.21%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Japanese are Immigrants from Micronesia (2.4%, a difference of 0.070%), Haitian (2.4%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from Guatemala (2.4%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Laos (2.4%, a difference of 0.39%), and Bangladeshi (2.3%, a difference of 0.50%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| English | 1.1 /100 | #239 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Panamanians | 0.9 /100 | #240 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Malaysians | 0.9 /100 | #241 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 0.8 /100 | #242 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.6 /100 | #243 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.6 /100 | #244 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Alsatians | 0.6 /100 | #245 | Tragic 2.3% |
| French | 0.5 /100 | #246 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Guatemalans | 0.5 /100 | #247 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.5 /100 | #248 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Liberians | 0.5 /100 | #249 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.5 /100 | #250 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 0.4 /100 | #251 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Japanese | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Haitians | 0.3 /100 | #254 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.3 /100 | #255 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Haiti | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 2.4% |
| West Indians | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 2.4% |
| British West Indians | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 2.4% |