Scottish vs Japanese Vision Disability
COMPARE
Scottish
Japanese
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Scottish
Japanese
2.3%
VISION DISABILITY
1.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
234th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.4%
VISION DISABILITY
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
253rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Scottish vs Japanese Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 565,142,315 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Scottish and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.496 and weighted average of 2.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 249,077,012 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Japanese and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.715 and weighted average of 2.4%, a difference of 2.3%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Scottish | Japanese |
| Minimum | 0.83% | 0.43% |
| Maximum | 64.6% | 14.1% |
| Range | 63.8% | 13.7% |
| Mean | 9.1% | 3.6% |
| Median | 4.1% | 2.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.0% | 2.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.7% | 3.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.7% | 1.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.9% | 2.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.8% | 2.5% |
Demographics Similar to Scottish and Japanese by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Scottish are Marshallese (2.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Congo (2.3%, a difference of 0.16%), Central American (2.3%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Portugal (2.3%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Cambodia (2.3%, a difference of 0.48%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Japanese are Immigrants from Micronesia (2.4%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Laos (2.4%, a difference of 0.39%), Bangladeshi (2.3%, a difference of 0.50%), Liberian (2.3%, a difference of 0.58%), and Subsaharan African (2.3%, a difference of 0.59%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Central Americans | 1.8 /100 | #233 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Scottish | 1.6 /100 | #234 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Marshallese | 1.5 /100 | #235 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 1.4 /100 | #236 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Portugal | 1.4 /100 | #237 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 1.1 /100 | #238 | Tragic 2.3% |
| English | 1.1 /100 | #239 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Panamanians | 0.9 /100 | #240 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Malaysians | 0.9 /100 | #241 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 0.8 /100 | #242 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.6 /100 | #243 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.6 /100 | #244 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Alsatians | 0.6 /100 | #245 | Tragic 2.3% |
| French | 0.5 /100 | #246 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Guatemalans | 0.5 /100 | #247 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.5 /100 | #248 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Liberians | 0.5 /100 | #249 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.5 /100 | #250 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 0.4 /100 | #251 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Japanese | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 2.4% |