Alsatian vs Malaysian Vision Disability
COMPARE
Alsatian
Malaysian
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Alsatians
Malaysians
2.3%
VISION DISABILITY
0.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
245th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.3%
VISION DISABILITY
0.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
241st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Alsatian vs Malaysian Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 82,677,708 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Alsatians and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.465 and weighted average of 2.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 226,017,600 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Malaysians and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.096 and weighted average of 2.3%, a difference of 0.71%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Alsatian | Malaysian |
| Minimum | 1.1% | 0.52% |
| Maximum | 6.7% | 12.2% |
| Range | 5.6% | 11.7% |
| Mean | 3.2% | 3.1% |
| Median | 2.7% | 2.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.3% | 2.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.8% | 3.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.5% | 1.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.4% | 2.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.4% | 2.3% |
Demographics Similar to Alsatians and Malaysians by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Alsatians are Immigrants from Nicaragua (2.3%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from West Indies (2.3%, a difference of 0.090%), French (2.3%, a difference of 0.15%), Guatemalan (2.3%, a difference of 0.19%), and Subsaharan African (2.3%, a difference of 0.21%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Malaysians are Panamanian (2.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Panama (2.3%, a difference of 0.14%), English (2.3%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Cambodia (2.3%, a difference of 0.30%), and Immigrants from Portugal (2.3%, a difference of 0.57%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Central Americans | 1.8 /100 | #233 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Scottish | 1.6 /100 | #234 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Marshallese | 1.5 /100 | #235 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 1.4 /100 | #236 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Portugal | 1.4 /100 | #237 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 1.1 /100 | #238 | Tragic 2.3% |
| English | 1.1 /100 | #239 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Panamanians | 0.9 /100 | #240 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Malaysians | 0.9 /100 | #241 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 0.8 /100 | #242 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.6 /100 | #243 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.6 /100 | #244 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Alsatians | 0.6 /100 | #245 | Tragic 2.3% |
| French | 0.5 /100 | #246 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Guatemalans | 0.5 /100 | #247 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.5 /100 | #248 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Liberians | 0.5 /100 | #249 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.5 /100 | #250 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 0.4 /100 | #251 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Japanese | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 2.4% |