British West Indian vs Japanese Vision Disability
COMPARE
British West Indian
Japanese
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
British West Indians
Japanese
2.4%
VISION DISABILITY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
258th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.4%
VISION DISABILITY
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
253rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
British West Indian vs Japanese Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 152,656,030 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of British West Indians and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.097 and weighted average of 2.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 249,077,012 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Japanese and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.715 and weighted average of 2.4%, a difference of 0.74%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | British West Indian | Japanese |
Minimum | 0.69% | 0.43% |
Maximum | 4.9% | 14.1% |
Range | 4.2% | 13.7% |
Mean | 2.5% | 3.6% |
Median | 2.5% | 2.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.1% | 2.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.9% | 3.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.88% | 1.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.81% | 2.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.80% | 2.5% |
Demographics Similar to British West Indians and Japanese by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to British West Indians are White/Caucasian (2.4%, a difference of 0.010%), West Indian (2.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Haiti (2.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Belizean (2.4%, a difference of 0.18%), and Fijian (2.4%, a difference of 0.40%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Japanese are Immigrants from Micronesia (2.4%, a difference of 0.070%), Haitian (2.4%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from Guatemala (2.4%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Laos (2.4%, a difference of 0.39%), and Bangladeshi (2.3%, a difference of 0.50%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Alsatians | 0.6 /100 | #245 | Tragic 2.3% |
French | 0.5 /100 | #246 | Tragic 2.3% |
Guatemalans | 0.5 /100 | #247 | Tragic 2.3% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.5 /100 | #248 | Tragic 2.3% |
Liberians | 0.5 /100 | #249 | Tragic 2.3% |
Bangladeshis | 0.5 /100 | #250 | Tragic 2.3% |
Immigrants | Laos | 0.4 /100 | #251 | Tragic 2.4% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 2.4% |
Japanese | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 2.4% |
Haitians | 0.3 /100 | #254 | Tragic 2.4% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.3 /100 | #255 | Tragic 2.4% |
Immigrants | Haiti | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 2.4% |
West Indians | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 2.4% |
British West Indians | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 2.4% |
Whites/Caucasians | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 2.4% |
Belizeans | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 2.4% |
Fijians | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 2.4% |
Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 2.4% |
Immigrants | Belize | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 2.4% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 2.4% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 2.4% |