Immigrants from Liberia vs Japanese Vision Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Liberia
Japanese
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Liberia
Japanese
2.4%
VISION DISABILITY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
264th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.4%
VISION DISABILITY
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
253rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Liberia vs Japanese Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 135,226,423 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Liberia and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.316 and weighted average of 2.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 249,077,012 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Japanese and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.715 and weighted average of 2.4%, a difference of 1.5%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Liberia | Japanese |
| Minimum | 0.59% | 0.43% |
| Maximum | 9.2% | 14.1% |
| Range | 8.6% | 13.7% |
| Mean | 2.8% | 3.6% |
| Median | 2.3% | 2.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.9% | 2.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.0% | 3.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.1% | 1.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.7% | 2.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.7% | 2.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Liberia and Japanese by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Liberia are Immigrants from Jamaica (2.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Mexican American Indian (2.4%, a difference of 0.070%), Ute (2.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Belize (2.4%, a difference of 0.12%), and Senegalese (2.4%, a difference of 0.16%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Japanese are Immigrants from Micronesia (2.4%, a difference of 0.070%), Haitian (2.4%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from Guatemala (2.4%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Laos (2.4%, a difference of 0.39%), and Bangladeshi (2.3%, a difference of 0.50%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.5 /100 | #248 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Liberians | 0.5 /100 | #249 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.5 /100 | #250 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 0.4 /100 | #251 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Japanese | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Haitians | 0.3 /100 | #254 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.3 /100 | #255 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Haiti | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 2.4% |
| West Indians | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 2.4% |
| British West Indians | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Belizeans | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Fijians | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Belize | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Ute | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Senegalese | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 2.4% |