Filipino vs Luxembourger Cognitive Disability
COMPARE
Filipino
Luxembourger
Cognitive Disability
Cognitive Disability Comparison
Filipinos
Luxembourgers
16.4%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
29th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.4%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
25th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Filipino vs Luxembourger Cognitive Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 254,348,780 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Filipinos and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.480 and weighted average of 16.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,680,571 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.425 and weighted average of 16.4%, a difference of 0.080%.
Cognitive Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Filipino | Luxembourger |
| Minimum | 2.0% | 1.6% |
| Maximum | 26.8% | 20.8% |
| Range | 24.8% | 19.3% |
| Mean | 13.8% | 12.9% |
| Median | 14.2% | 13.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.4% | 11.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.6% | 15.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.2% | 4.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.3% | 3.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.2% | 3.5% |
Demographics Similar to Filipinos and Luxembourgers by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Filipinos are Czech (16.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Romania (16.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Pakistan (16.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Polish (16.4%, a difference of 0.030%), and Immigrants from Croatia (16.4%, a difference of 0.050%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Immigrants from Croatia (16.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Argentina (16.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Pakistan (16.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Polish (16.4%, a difference of 0.050%), and Croatian (16.4%, a difference of 0.060%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 16.3% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 16.3% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 16.3% |
| Bulgarians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 16.3% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 16.3% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 16.4% |
| Croatians | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 16.4% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 16.4% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.9 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 16.4% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 99.9 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 16.4% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.9 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 16.4% |
| Poles | 99.9 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 16.4% |
| Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 16.4% |
| Czechs | 99.9 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 16.4% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 99.9 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 16.4% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 99.9 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 16.4% |
| Italians | 99.9 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 16.4% |
| Russians | 99.9 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 16.4% |
| Slovaks | 99.9 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 16.4% |
| Greeks | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 16.4% |
| Slovenes | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 16.5% |