Filipino vs Uruguayan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,500,753 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Uruguayans within Filipino communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.013. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Filipinos within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Uruguayans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Filipinos corresponds to an increase of 1.3 Uruguayans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Filipino and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($74,224 compared to $53,680, a difference of 38.3%), median family income ($138,397 compared to $100,656, a difference of 37.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($128,723 compared to $93,631, a difference of 37.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($57,740 compared to $52,465, a difference of 10.1%), wage/income gap (29.7% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 18.1%), and median female earnings ($49,508 compared to $39,228, a difference of 26.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Filipino and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (7.4% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 59.9%), child poverty among boys under 16 (11.1% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 47.8%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (11.6% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 46.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.0% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 1.0%), single male poverty (10.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 12.4%), and single father poverty (14.0% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 13.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Filipino and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 23.9%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.6% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 22.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.1% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 22.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 0.52%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Filipino and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.7% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 10.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.4% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.76%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.040%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.060%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Filipino and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (23.0% compared to 33.1%, a difference of 44.1%), single mother households (4.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 40.0%), and single father households (1.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 31.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.23, a difference of 1.0%), family households (65.9% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 2.2%), and family households with children (28.6% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Filipino and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 22.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 16.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 88.8%, a difference of 1.0%), no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 8.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 9.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Filipino and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 94.2%), professional degree (7.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 63.3%), and master's degree (23.4% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 53.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.29%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.29%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.29%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Filipino and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (1.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 29.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 29.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (8.0% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 27.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.4% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 1.8%), cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 2.8%), and hearing disability (2.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 6.5%).