Ecuadorian vs Burmese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 297,148,285 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Burmese within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.315. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.023% in Burmese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to a decrease of 22.6 Burmese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($95,114 compared to $123,369, a difference of 29.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($93,739 compared to $121,444, a difference of 29.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,958 compared to $71,139, a difference of 29.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,911 compared to $54,800, a difference of 1.7%), median female earnings ($39,117 compared to $44,911, a difference of 14.8%), and median earnings ($45,214 compared to $54,559, a difference of 20.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 72.0%), married-couple family poverty (6.5% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 50.7%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (19.3% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 49.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 1.2%), single male poverty (12.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 6.6%), and single father poverty (16.5% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 32.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 26.0%), and male unemployment (6.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 26.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 5.1%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 11.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 11.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 9.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.58%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 0.83%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.91%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 36.1%), births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 26.2%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 1.2%), family households with children (27.8% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 2.5%), and average family size (3.32 compared to 3.22, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 135.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 52.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 46.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 16.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 37.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 46.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 80.6%), professional degree (3.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 56.7%), and no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 51.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.1% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (97.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 22.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 16.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 2.7%), disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 3.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 3.3%).