Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Pima Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 46,547,174 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Pima within Immigrant from Middle Africa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.332. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Middle Africa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.215% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Middle Africa corresponds to an increase of 215.1 Pima.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,529 compared to $30,644, a difference of 29.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($91,293 compared to $73,365, a difference of 24.4%), and median household income ($77,559 compared to $63,262, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,254 compared to $82,821, a difference of 0.69%), wage/income gap (22.4% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 5.9%), and median female earnings ($37,965 compared to $35,326, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Pima communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 111.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 97.8%), and family poverty (10.1% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 81.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.6% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 5.9%), single mother poverty (30.3% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 27.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.1% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 28.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.8% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 145.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 106.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 102.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 11.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 27.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (67.7% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 18.0%), in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 17.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 7.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.6% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 11.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 13.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 67.7%), births to unmarried women (34.9% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 47.3%), and currently married (43.0% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.7% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 1.8%), family households with children (28.0% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 3.2%), and family households (61.9% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Pima communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 38.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 35.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (53.4% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 2.7%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 4.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 20.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Pima communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (14.6% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 57.8%), bachelor's degree (36.6% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 57.7%), and associate's degree (44.7% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 47.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (94.2% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 0.30%), 8th grade (95.1% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.51%), and nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.62%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (24.1% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 60.0%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 52.1%), and ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 39.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.6% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 1.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 4.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 11.7%).