Yuman vs Latvian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Yuman
Latvian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Yuman
Latvians
959
SOCIAL INDEX
7.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
331st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,576
SOCIAL INDEX
93.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
12th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Latvian Integration in Yuman Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 33,335,201 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians within Yuman communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.884. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Yuman within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.026% in Latvians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Yuman corresponds to an increase of 25.6 Latvians.
Yuman vs Latvian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Yuman and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($33,236 compared to $52,649, a difference of 58.4%), median family income ($78,055 compared to $120,301, a difference of 54.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($72,956 compared to $108,926, a difference of 49.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,933 compared to $52,783, a difference of 3.6%), wage/income gap (23.3% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 19.4%), and median female earnings ($35,377 compared to $43,941, a difference of 24.2%).
Income Metric | Yuman | Latvian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $33,236 | Exceptional $52,649 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $78,055 | Exceptional $120,301 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $68,743 | Exceptional $97,311 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $39,523 | Exceptional $53,001 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $45,446 | Exceptional $63,498 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,377 | Exceptional $43,941 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $50,933 | Excellent $52,783 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $72,956 | Exceptional $108,926 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,139 | Exceptional $115,957 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,110 | Exceptional $67,326 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 23.3% | Tragic 27.9% |
Yuman vs Latvian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Yuman and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (9.7% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 149.7%), family poverty (16.6% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 135.1%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (30.6% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 129.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.0% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 23.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (13.1% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 38.3%), and single mother poverty (37.8% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 40.5%).
Poverty Metric | Yuman | Latvian |
Poverty | Tragic 20.2% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Families | Tragic 16.6% | Exceptional 7.1% |
Males | Tragic 19.5% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Females | Tragic 20.8% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.0% | Exceptional 19.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 22.9% | Exceptional 11.8% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 29.5% | Exceptional 14.5% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 28.9% | Exceptional 13.2% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 30.6% | Exceptional 13.4% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 27.1% | Exceptional 13.5% |
Single Males | Tragic 21.3% | Good 12.7% |
Single Females | Tragic 29.4% | Exceptional 19.0% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 28.4% | Fair 16.5% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 37.8% | Exceptional 26.9% |
Married Couples | Tragic 9.7% | Exceptional 3.9% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 15.4% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 20.2% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Yuman vs Latvian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Yuman and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (16.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 304.5%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (37.4% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 124.1%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (9.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 123.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 17.9%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 21.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 28.8%).
Unemployment Metric | Yuman | Latvian |
Unemployment | Tragic 9.1% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Tragic 8.6% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Females | Tragic 9.6% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 16.3% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 37.4% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 15.8% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 11.0% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 10.6% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 16.9% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 9.5% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 6.1% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 6.8% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 6.7% | Excellent 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 14.6% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 14.8% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 9.8% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Yuman vs Latvian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Yuman and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (27.7% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 40.6%), in labor force | age 35-44 (74.7% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 14.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (57.8% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (70.3% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 8.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (79.3% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 8.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (76.3% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 9.8%).
Labor Participation Metric | Yuman | Latvian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 57.8% | Excellent 65.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 71.7% | Exceptional 80.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 27.7% | Exceptional 38.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 70.3% | Exceptional 76.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 79.3% | Exceptional 86.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 77.1% | Exceptional 86.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 74.7% | Exceptional 85.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 76.3% | Exceptional 83.8% |
Yuman vs Latvian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Yuman and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (9.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 82.3%), single father households (3.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 64.3%), and births to unmarried women (44.4% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 60.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 8.5%), family households (69.3% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 10.4%), and married-couple households (43.3% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 10.6%).
Family Structure Metric | Yuman | Latvian |
Family Households | Exceptional 69.3% | Tragic 62.8% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 29.5% | Tragic 26.4% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 43.3% | Exceptional 47.9% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.47 | Tragic 3.11 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 3.3% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 9.6% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Currently Married | Tragic 42.6% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.6% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 44.4% | Exceptional 27.7% |
Yuman vs Latvian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Yuman and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.9% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 51.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.7% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 8.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (19.9% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 3.3%), 1 or more vehicles in household (85.5% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 5.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 5.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Yuman | Latvian |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 14.9% | Excellent 9.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 85.5% | Excellent 90.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 51.7% | Excellent 56.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Good 19.9% | Fair 19.3% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Good 6.5% | Fair 6.1% |
Yuman vs Latvian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Yuman and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.2% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 114.6%), professional degree (3.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 90.8%), and bachelor's degree (24.5% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 87.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.63%), 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.65%), and kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.66%).
Education Level Metric | Yuman | Latvian |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.5% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Fair 97.9% | Exceptional 98.5% |
Kindergarten | Fair 97.9% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Fair 97.8% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Fair 97.8% | Exceptional 98.4% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Exceptional 98.2% |
5th Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.7% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.2% | Exceptional 97.2% |
8th Grade | Tragic 94.9% | Exceptional 97.0% |
9th Grade | Tragic 93.8% | Exceptional 96.4% |
10th Grade | Tragic 92.0% | Exceptional 95.6% |
11th Grade | Tragic 89.7% | Exceptional 94.7% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 86.5% | Exceptional 93.6% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 84.0% | Exceptional 92.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 79.2% | Exceptional 89.2% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 55.1% | Exceptional 71.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 48.7% | Exceptional 66.1% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 31.3% | Exceptional 53.9% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 24.5% | Exceptional 46.1% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 9.2% | Exceptional 19.8% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.3% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 2.6% |
Yuman vs Latvian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Yuman and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (15.8% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 55.4%), disability age 18 to 34 (10.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 54.4%), and vision disability (3.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 50.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.58%), hearing disability (3.4% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 5.5%), and cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 8.6%).
Disability Metric | Yuman | Latvian |
Disability | Tragic 14.6% | Excellent 11.4% |
Males | Tragic 14.7% | Good 11.1% |
Females | Tragic 14.5% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 0.95% | Tragic 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 10.6% | Poor 6.8% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 15.8% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 31.5% | Exceptional 21.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 54.4% | Exceptional 45.1% |
Vision | Tragic 3.0% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.4% | Tragic 3.2% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.1% | Exceptional 16.6% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.9% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 2.3% |