Immigrants from Peru vs Chickasaw No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Immigrants from Peru
Chickasaw
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Immigrants from Peru
Chickasaw
11.5%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
4.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
234th/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.9%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
43rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Peru vs Chickasaw No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 328,351,491 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Peru and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.030 and weighted average of 11.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,505,491 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.334 and weighted average of 7.9%, a difference of 46.2%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Peru | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 1.1% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 36.5% | 15.9% |
| Range | 35.3% | 14.6% |
| Mean | 10.3% | 6.1% |
| Median | 8.9% | 5.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.1% | 4.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.2% | 7.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.2% | 3.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.2% | 3.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.2% | 3.0% |
Similar Demographics by No Vehicles in Household
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Peru by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Peru are Houma (11.5%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Turkey (11.5%, a difference of 0.23%), Kiowa (11.5%, a difference of 0.38%), Immigrants from Norway (11.4%, a difference of 0.42%), and Immigrants from Japan (11.4%, a difference of 0.42%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 5.4 /100 | #227 | Tragic 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 5.3 /100 | #228 | Tragic 11.4% |
| Ugandans | 5.3 /100 | #229 | Tragic 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 5.1 /100 | #230 | Tragic 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 5.1 /100 | #231 | Tragic 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 4.8 /100 | #232 | Tragic 11.5% |
| Houma | 4.7 /100 | #233 | Tragic 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 4.5 /100 | #234 | Tragic 11.5% |
| Kiowa | 4.0 /100 | #235 | Tragic 11.5% |
| Cree | 3.5 /100 | #236 | Tragic 11.6% |
| Ute | 3.3 /100 | #237 | Tragic 11.6% |
| Russians | 3.2 /100 | #238 | Tragic 11.6% |
| Taiwanese | 2.8 /100 | #239 | Tragic 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 2.7 /100 | #240 | Tragic 11.7% |
| Eastern Europeans | 2.7 /100 | #241 | Tragic 11.7% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Swiss (7.9%, a difference of 0.080%), French Canadian (7.8%, a difference of 0.21%), Czechoslovakian (7.8%, a difference of 0.36%), Choctaw (7.9%, a difference of 0.36%), and Immigrants from Fiji (7.8%, a difference of 0.46%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Iraqis | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Basques | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Creek | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 99.9 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Czechoslovakians | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| French Canadians | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Swiss | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Chickasaw | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Choctaw | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 99.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Spanish | 99.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Northern Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Afghans | 99.9 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 99.9 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Belgians | 99.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 8.0% |